Felix JELINEK, Appellant, v. Otis BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating in dicta that if the record merely contained conflicting opinions of two vocational experts, the ALJ’s finding would be upheld
• finding the ALJ’s 22 evaluation of the evidence was “totally deficient” where the ALJ “arbitrarily reject[ed] the claimant’s 23 vocational expert’s reasoned opinion”
• ALJ’s failure to include in hypothetical all tests and findings made on claimant by Sister Kenney Institute was error
• ALJ's failure to include in hypothetical all tests and findings was error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).