· 3/29/2004
Felix Ilkechukwu Asika v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Citations
- 362 F.3d 264
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5776
- 2004 WL 603522
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court lacks jurisdiction to consider an argument that was not raised before the Board
- holding that we lack jurisdiction to consider an argument that was not raised before the Board
- holding that we lack jurisdiction when claimants fail to exhaust all administrative remedies
- acknowledging that argument similar to that advanced by Adams “has some force”
- noting “apparent anomaly” of “limiting to five years the Attorney General’s authority to deport those aliens who received lawful permanent residence status through adjustment, but not those who gained such status upon entering the country”
- deferring to the Attorney General’s interpretation that § 1256 does not limit the government’s power to remove an alien more than five years after an erroneous adjustment of status
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wilkins, Luttig, Traxler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.