Felipe Gustavo Rivera-Zurita v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming, without explanation, that the petitioner’s placement in the custody of the county sheriff, as well as his thirty-day confinement in jail, counted as confine- ment to a penal institution for purposes of § 1101(f)(7)
• “The failure to raise an issue on appeal to the Board constitutes failure to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to that question. . . .”
• “Judicial review does not extend to points the alien could have made before the Board but did not.”
• “The failure to raise an issue on appeal to the Board constitutes failure to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to that question and deprives the Court of Appeals of jurisdiction to hear the matter.”
• “The failure to raise an issue on appeal to the Board constitutes failure to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to that question and deprives the Court of Appeals of jurisdiction to hear the matter.”
• “The failure to raise an issue on appeal to the Board constitutes failure to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to that question and deprives the Court of Appeals of jurisdiction to hear the matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).