Feliciano v. Rosemar Silver Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• government interest in promoting marriage would be “subverted” by recognition of “a right to recover for loss of consortium by a person who has not accepted the correlative responsibilities of marriage”
• \[T]hat value [of marriage] would be subverted by our recognition of a right to recover for loss of consortium by a person who has not accepted the correlative responsibilities'of marriage.\
• nonmarital partners have no right to sue for loss of consortium
• nonmarital partners have no right to sue for loss of consortium
• where the court refused to grant recovery for loss of consortium where the plaintiffs were not married but lived together; no right to recovery arose because the plaintiffs had not accepted the correlative responsibilities of marriage
• nonmarital partners have no right to sue for loss of consortium

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).