Felich v. Meier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The interpretation of a contract is an issue of law [and] [e]xpert testimony is not proper for issues of law.”
• “Expert testimony is not 25 proper for issues of law. Experts interpret and analyze factual evidence. They do not 26 testify about the law. . . .”
• “Experts ‘interpret and analyze 6 factual evidence. They do not testify about the law.’”
• “Expert testimony is not proper for issues of law.”
• “Expert 2 testimony is not proper for issues of law.”
• “Expert testimony is not proper for issues of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).