FELGER v. Duquesne Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting § 383 and holding that “because Duquesne Light had an easement and was required to maintain the pole, it should be held to the same liability as a possessor in this case”
• easement holder held to same liability as “possessor” of land under Section 339 of Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965), dealing with artificial conditions highly dangerous to trespassing children
• easement holder held to same liability as \possessor\ of land under Section 339 of Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965), dealing with artificial conditions highly dangerous to trespassing children
• school parking served as a playground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).