Feldstein v. Segall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• If a way of necessity is not implied in the grant, it [cjannot be established by any subsequent necessity
• “If a way of necessity is not implied in the grant, it cannot be established by any subsequent necessity.”
• “We need not say, as has been said of unenclosed woodland or other unenclosed or unimproved land, that use of the [ ] land, while unenclosed, is presumed to have been permissive or not adverse.” (Citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).