Skip to main content
· 7/13/2010

Feldman v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

Citations

  • 723 F. Supp. 2d 357
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69861
  • 2010 WL 2787698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that warning signs of upcoming time travel, after effects showing time traveling is complete, a tragic romance related to time traveling, and significant consequences as a result of time travel are scènes à faire or stock scenes in the portrayal of time travel
  • “A state law claim is preempted if ‘it does not require an element beyond mere copying, preparation of derivative works, performance, distribution or display.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas P. Woodlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.