· 7/13/2010
Feldman v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
Citations
- 723 F. Supp. 2d 357
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69861
- 2010 WL 2787698
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that warning signs of upcoming time travel, after effects showing time traveling is complete, a tragic romance related to time traveling, and significant consequences as a result of time travel are scènes à faire or stock scenes in the portrayal of time travel
- “A state law claim is preempted if ‘it does not require an element beyond mere copying, preparation of derivative works, performance, distribution or display.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas P. Woodlock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.