Feldman v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that investors' claims to assets held by a receiver was not collateral to the merits of the action
• concluding that investors’ claims to assets held by a receiver was not collateral to the merits of the action
• holding that it lacked 17 jurisdiction over an appeal where the appellants did not obtain certification and direction 18 for entry of judgment required by Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).