Feldman v. Bomar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding case was moot where plaintiffs did not “face a continuous, remediable harm that concretely affect[ed] their existing interests” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• dismissing an appeal as moot because the court lacked power to grant any effective relief since it could not resurrect pigs or retroactively remedy any pain that they might have felt from being shot
• “The basic question in determining mootness is whether there is a present 28 controversy as to which effective relief can be granted.”
• “The basic question in determining mootness is whether there is a present controversy as to which effective relief can be granted.” (quoting Nw. Envtl. Def. Ctr. v. Gordon, 849 F.2d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir. 1988))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).