Felder v. Leftwich
Citations
- 123 La. 931
- 49 So. 645
- 1909 La. LEXIS 803
Syllabus
<p>1. Mortgages (§ 25*) — Amount oe Debt — Evidence.</p> <p>In a suit to foreclose certain mortgages, evidence held to warrant a finding that the purchase price of a plantation to secure which the mortgages were executed was $3,150, and not $6,500, as claimed by the mortgagee, and that $3,150 was the amount of the mortgage debt.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Mortgages, Cent. Dig. §' 42; Dec. Dig. § 25.*)</p> <p>2. Mortgages (§ 581*) — Foreclosure — Attorney’s Fees.</p> <p>Where no extension of a mortgage debt was shown beyond July 1, 1907, and suit was brought on the 3d, the mortgagor was liable for costs and 10 per cent, attorney’s fees as provided.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Mortgages, Cent. Dig. § 1670; Dec. Dig. § 581.*]</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the court had supplemental jurisdiction over the defendant’s counterclaims in part because the resolution of the parties’ claims would “involve much of the same witnesses and evidence”
- dismissing compulsory counterclaims in FLSA action because any recovery on them would run afoul of Brennan
- “There is no dispute that the [c]ourt has federal question jurisdiction over [the p]laintiffs’ FLSA claim.”
- “There is no dispute that the [c]ourt has federal question jurisdiction over [the p]laintiffs’ FLSA claim.”
- “There is no dispute that the [c]ourt has federal question jurisdiction over [the p]laintiffs’ FLSA claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Provosty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.