Felder Ex Rel. Estate of Ingram v. WMATA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating in dicta that Burkhart does not reach the issue of WMATA's internal policies and that it is \unclear\ if WMATA policies apply
• stating in dicta that Burkhart does not reach the issue of WMATA’s internal policies and that it is “unclear” if WMATA policies apply
• dismissing claims where “the plaintiff alleged no facts to suggest, beyond the plaintiff’s own speculation, that WMATA had policies and procedures in place”
• declining to grant discovery where the plaintiff “alleged no facts to suggest . . . that WMATA had policies and procedures in place related to employee training”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).