Skip to main content
· 12/31/2015

Felder Ex Rel. Estate of Ingram v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Citations

  • 153 F. Supp. 3d 221
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding discipline imposed by WMATA was factual and thus must be disclosed to the plaintiff
  • questioning whether a document must be submitted as part of a mandatory government report to qualify for the self-evaluative privilege
  • applying self-evaluative privilege to WMATA disciplinary memorandum and safety reports prepared pursuant to WMATA’s “legally-mandated obligation to investigate [an] accident”
  • deeming an argument that a document was protected as work product abandoned when the party claimed that protection in an earlier motion but not in the motion then before the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.