Felch v. Air Florida, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the jurisdiction where the marital parties are domiciled has a greater interest than the place where the injury occurred
• noting that under governmental interest analysis, an action for loss of consortium is typically governed by the law of the state of marital domicile rather than the law of the state where the wrong occurred
• “[U]nder the District of Columbia choice of law rules, the law of the state of marital domicile rather than the law of the state where the wrong occurred should control a loss of consortium action.” (citing Linnell v. Sloan, 636 F.2d 65 (4th Cir. 1980)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).