Skip to main content
· 11/8/2000

Feitler v. the Animation Celection, Inc.

Citations

  • 13 P.3d 1044
  • 170 Or. App. 702
  • 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[a]s a general matter, [Or. Rev. Stat. § 646.608(1)(s)] requires transparency around costs passed on to the consumer” in the sale context
  • to obtain promised feature of exclusivity of drawing collection, the plaintiff would have had to purchase drawings that the defendant withheld; thus, the plaintiff incurred “ascertainable loss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Haselton, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.