Feitler v. Harrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the purpose of ERISA [is] to promote the interests of plan beneficiaries and allow them to enforce their statutory rights.”
• suggesting that any defendant found to have “violated ERISA, thereby depriving plaintiffs of rights under a[n employee benefit] plan and violating a Congressional mandate” is “culpable” within the meaning of the first Chambless factor (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[A] showing of actual innocence can only refer to those 27 state-law requirements that must be satisfied to impose the death penalty, i.e., the 1 elements of the capital crime and minimum required aggravating factors.”
• stating defendant was culpable when it \violated ERISA\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).