Feinstein v. Carey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing how § 905(b)’s purpose was to prevent Ryan triangle suits and that insurance procurement provisions do not amount to indirect liability but instead “merely [] allocate initially the burden of procuring insurance”
• “[T]he paramount principle of insurance policy construction is that a policy 10 should be interpreted to give effect to the intention of the parties .... In ascertaining that intention, 11 an endorsement normally prevails over inconsistent provisions of the policy.”
• “[T]he 15 paramount principle of insurance policy construction is that a policy should be interpreted to give 16 effect to the intention of the parties .... In ascertaining that intention, an endorsement normally 17 prevails over inconsistent provisions of the policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).