Feinour v. Ricker Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiff hired a process server “[s]everal days” after being told that service could not be perfected through the sheriff’s office
• discussing split of authority over whether “greatest possible diligence” standard applies when plaintiff learns of a problem with service, or when defendant raises the issue in responsive pleading
• counsel’s legal assistant followed up multiple times with the Fulton County Sheriff’s Department over a two-month period and was told that it was still attempting service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).