Feingold v. Feingold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting former CEO’s claim of an attorney-client relationship between him and corporation counsel despite fact that said counsel had offered advice to CEO regarding CEO’s preferred stock transaction
• “A formal contract is not necessary to show that an attorney-client relationship has been formed.”
• “The court may look to the intent and conduct of the parties to determine whether the relationship was actually formed.”
• identifying standard employed under New York and California law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).