Skip to main content
· 2/28/2002

Fein v. R.P.H., Inc.

Citations

  • 68 S.W.3d 260
  • 2002 WL 192439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a directed verdict is a legal sufficiency challenge
  • stating courts are not at liberty to redraft the terms of a contract while professing to construe it
  • reversing portion of judgment awarding attorney’s fees based on failure to segregate, affirming remainder of judgment, and remanding for new trial limited to issue of attorney’s fees
  • “The test for legal sufficiency is the same for summary judgments, directed verdicts, judgments notwithstanding the verdict, and appellate no-evidence review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John S. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.