Feigin v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[c]ommon law tort claims based upon the wrongful disclosure of medical or personal health information are not preempted by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996”
• holding that “[c]ommon law tort claims based upon the wrongful disclosure of medical or personal health information are not preempted by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996”
• concluding that “the allegations asserted in the instant case, which pertain to the improper disclosure of medical records, [do] not fall within the MPLA’s definition of ‘health care,’ and, therefore, the MPLA does not apply”
• concluding that “the allegations asserted in the instant case, which pertain to the improper disclosure of medical records, [do] not fall within the MPLA’s definition of ‘health care,’ and, therefore, the MPLA does not apply”
• holding HIPAA does not preempt state law causes of action for wrongful disclosure of health care information
• “improper disclosure of medical records[ ] does not fall within the MPLA’s definition of ‘health care,’ and, therefore, the MPLA does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).