Feibleman v. Mississippi Cane Syrup Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mandating suppression of illegally seized evidence of bookmaking activities and rejecting State’s argument in support of a good faith exception
• mandating suppression of illegally seized evidence of bookmaking activities and rejecting State's argument in support of a good faith exception
• rejecting good faith exception to exclusionary rule: “Eyes may not be closed to the infringement of a constitutional right because the officer was well-meaning and the transgression is deemed slight”
• rejecting good faith exception to exclusionary rule: \Eyes may not be closed to the infringement of a constitutional right because the officer was well-meaning and the transgression is deemed slight\
• \Eyes may not be closed to the infringement of a constitutional right because the officer was well-meaning or the transgression is deemed slight; and erosions must at all times be carefully guarded against lest they lead to the destruction of the right itself.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).