Fei Yan Zhu v. Attorney General United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the BIA does not need to “expressly parse each point or discuss each piece of evidence presented”
• defining the abuse-of-discretion standard as whether “the BIA meaningfully considered the evidence and arguments . . . presented”
• “[T]he BIA must provide an indication that it considered such evidence, and if the evidence is rejected, an explanation as to why it was rejected.”
• “Rather, we will remand for the BIA to meaningfully review the evidence, which may yield a different result or a further explanation for the BIA’s decision.” (footnote omitted)
• “Rather, we will remand for the BIA to meaningfully review the evidence, which may yield a different result or a further explanation for the BIA’s decision.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).