Fegans v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the Bureau of Prisons has discretion to choose the location of an inmate’s imprisonment
• emphasizing “the limited scope of our review” and deferring to the BOP’s interpretation of the district court’s intent
• noting the disagreement between Romandine and McCarthy with regard to a yet to be imposed state sentence
• denying coram nobis relief when state court ordered sentences to run concurrently, but federal court did not intend sentences to run concurrently
• applying Mayotte and noting that the district court’s intent may not always be clear
• “[T]he BOP found no evidence that the federal sentencing judge intended the sentences to be concurrent. This agency finding is entitled to substantial deference[J”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).