· 12/17/2007
Feezor v. Tesstab Operations Group, Inc.
Citations
- 524 F. Supp. 2d 1222
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92260
- 2007 WL 4410262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Given the disparity in terms of comprehensiveness of the remedy sought, state law 23 claims substantially predominate over the ADA for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(2).”
- “Given the disparity in terms of comprehensiveness of the remedy sought, 26 state law claims substantially predominate over the ADA for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 27 1367(c)(2).”
- “Given the disparity in terms of 26 comprehensiveness of the remedy sought, state law claims substantially predominate over 27 the ADA for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(2).”
- “Given the disparity in terms of 28 comprehensiveness of the remedy sought, state law claims substantially predominate over 1 the ADA for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(2).”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: M. James Lorenz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.