Feeney v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that recission of already-issued remedial plan to explore other courses of treatment was not deliberate indifference
• concluding that no deliberate indifference occurred where plaintiff was examined by medical professionals regularly and received various treatments
• affirming grant of summary judgment to defendants despite twenty-two-month delay in providing inmate with orthopedic footwear where there were ongoing efforts to address inmate’s concerns, including multiple appointments with external medical providers
• when “plaintiff’s allegations simply reflect a disagreement on the appropriate course of treatment, such a dispute . . . falls short of alleging a constitutional violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).