Skip to main content
· 10/30/2007

Feed Management Systems, Inc. v. Brill

Citations

  • 518 F. Supp. 2d 1094
  • 69 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 729
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80134
  • 2007 WL 3156282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permitting plaintiff to file counterclaims in reply because defendants’ counterclaims were permissive and plaintiff’s counterclaims in reply were compulsory
  • weighing plaintiff’s counterclaim-in-reply alleging “infringement of several trademarks” against defendant’s infringement claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael J. Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.