Skip to main content
· 2/12/1991

Fednav, Ltd. v. Isoramar, S.A.

Citations

  • 925 F.2d 599
  • 1991 A.M.C. 1425
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2104
  • 1991 WL 17043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is well -established that a charter party agreement is a maritime contract.” (citations 25 omitted)
  • vessel owner’s agreement to contribute to lessee’s settlement of claim not maritime contract because subject matter of suit was covenant to pay damages
  • vessel owner’s agreement to contribute to lessee’s settlement of claim not maritime contract because subject matter of suit was covenant to pay damages
  • vessel owner’s agreement to contribute to lessee’s settlement of claim not maritime contract because subject matter of suit was covenant to pay damages
  • agreement to act as surety for another’s breach of a charter party is non-maritime
  • “It is well established that a charter party agreement is a maritime contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Pierce, Miner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.