Fedmet Corporation v. M/V Buyalyk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the case without prejudice in favor of arbitration
• holding that “district courts have discretion to dismiss cases in favor of arbitration,” but not implying any obligation to do so
• holding that “district courts have discretion to dismiss cases in favor of arbitration” but not implying any obligation to do so
• stating that “district courts have discretion to dismiss cases in favor of arbitration,” but not implying any obligation to do so
• stating that “district courts have discretion to dismiss cases in favor of arbitration,” but not implying any obligation to do so
• finding that if all issues raised before the district court are arbitrable, dismissal of the case is not inappropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).