Fedie v. Travelodge International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a special relationship of the type described in Restatement [Second] § 314A triggers the duty to protect against third parties outlined in Restatement [Second] § 320
• discussing the existence of duty based on Second Restatement §§ 302 and 302B, and noting that both sections rely on foreseeability to determine duty
• “Although proximate cause is usually a question of fact for the jury, ‘the determination of facts upon which there could be no reasonable difference of opinion is in the hands of the court.’” (quoting W. Prosser & W. Keeton, Law of Torts § 45, at 319-20 (5th ed. 1984))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).