FEDERATED NAT. INS. CO. v. Physicians Charter Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \There is no provision in Florida's personal injury protection statutes for the payment of policy benefits to a third party who has not performed medical services.\
• “There is no provision in Florida’s personal injury protection statutes for the payment of policy benefits to a third party who has not performed medical services.”
• \There is no provision in Florida's personal injury protection statutes for the payment of policy benefits to a third party who has not performed medical services.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• PROF. CONS. SERV. v. Hartford Life and Acc. Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-16· cited 10×
• Gables Insurance Recovery, Inc. v. Seminole Casualty Insurance
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-01· cited 6×
• Med. Manag. Group of Orlado, Inc. v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Company
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-08· cited 5×
• State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pressley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-12· cited 3×
• Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Quality Diagnostic Health Care, Inc.
  S.D. Florida· 2019-02-25· cited 2×