Federal Union Surety Co. v. State
Citations
- 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 392
Syllabus
<p>Reporter’s Note. On July 2, 1915, the following entry was made in the foregoing case:</p> <p>This day this cause came on to be heard upon the application and motion of the plaintiff in error, Federal Union Surety Company, to modify the judgment heretofore rendered in this court affirming the judgment of the circuit court of Franklin county, Ohio, theretofore rendered in this cause, and the same was heard upoñ the admitted facts and statements, and arguments of counsel. And the court upon consideration thereof cloth find that the bond executed by the plaintiff in error upon which this action was based, provided that in case of default thereof the State of Ohio should be entitled to recover thereon the amount of the principal sum, together with interest at the rate of two and one-half per centum per annum.</p> <p>The court doth further find that said circuit court in rendering judgment in favor of the State of Ohio and against said Federal Union Surety Company in said cause, computed the interest on the principal amount of the default, as set forth in plaintiff’s petition below, at the rate of six per centum per annum, from May 16th, 1908, to December 30th, 1912, the date of the rendition of said judgment by the circuit court of Franklin county, Ohio, to-wit, two years and 183 days, when the same should have been computed at the rate of two and one-half per centum per annum.</p> <p>The court doth further find that in making the computation of interest in the method aforesaid, the circuit court in and for Franklin county, Ohio, gave judgment in favor of the State of Ohio against said Federal Union Surety Company, plaintiff in error herein, at said date, to-wit, December 30th, 1912, in the amount of $14,122.25, when according to law and the evidence the amount of said judgment at said date, so given in favor of said State of Ohio against said Federal Union Surety Company should have been for $11,755.58.</p> <p>The court doth further find that said amount of - $11,755
Judges: Donahue, Johnson, Newman, Nichols, Shauck, Wanamaker, Wilkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.