Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 10/12/1959

Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co.

Citations

  • 360 U.S. 55
  • 79 S. Ct. 1005
  • 3 L. Ed. 2d 1079
  • 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • operating from the premise that competition is required for both § 2(d) and § 2(e) claims
  • proscriptions of [13(c) ] are “absolute” and do not require showing of competitive injury
  • smaller firms said to suffer “hopeless competitive disadvantage” unrelated to cost
  • smaller firms said to suffer \hopeless competitive disadvantage\ unrelated to cost
  • catalogues, storage cabinets, and transportation costs
  • catalogues, storage cabinets, and transportation costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.