· 9/12/2001
Federal Trade Commission v. Keith H. Gill Richard Murkey
Citations
- 265 F.3d 944
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 9911
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8048
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20319
- 2001 WL 1044631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the district court has broad discretion to control its docket
- observing that district courts have broad discretion in controlling their 7|| dockets
- rejecting a defendant’s claim that fees paid by consumers who have benefitted from the services should be excluded from restitution because there was “no authority” for such an argument
- identifying the third element for a section 5 violation as a representation that is “likely to mislead consumers”
- identifying the second element for a section 5 violation as a representation that is “likely to mislead”
- setting forth standard of review and explaining that a district court has broad discretion to control its docket
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Noonan, Silverman, Paez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.