Skip to main content
· 9/12/2001

Federal Trade Commission v. Keith H. Gill Richard Murkey

Citations

  • 265 F.3d 944
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 9911
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8048
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20319
  • 2001 WL 1044631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the district court has broad discretion to control its docket
  • observing that district courts have broad discretion in controlling their 7|| dockets
  • rejecting a defendant’s claim that fees paid by consumers who have benefitted from the services should be excluded from restitution because there was “no authority” for such an argument
  • identifying the third element for a section 5 violation as a representation that is “likely to mislead consumers”
  • identifying the second element for a section 5 violation as a representation that is “likely to mislead”
  • setting forth standard of review and explaining that a district court has broad discretion to control its docket

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noonan, Silverman, Paez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.