Federal Trade Commission v. Chapman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying “cleaning a[n] ... office” and “delivering lunches” as conduct that would not support liability under the substantial assistance rule
• Noting the Commission rejected a rule that proposed a requirement that the “substantial assistance [be] related to the commission or furtherance of that act or practice.”
• “The decision to grant reconsideration is committed to the sound discretion of the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).