Federal Trade Commission v. Arch Coal, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the HHI increase of 49 to 2,103 was “far from compelling,” and thus the prima facie case was “fairly weak.”
• noting that “[i]n many contexts . . . antitrust authorities do not accord great weight to the subjective views of customers in the market.”
• noting that \[i]n many contexts ... antitrust authorities do not accord great weight to the subjective views of customers in the market.\
• taking abandonment of the transaction into account in weighing the equities
• taking abandonment of the transaction into account in weighing the equities
• it is “the region in which the seller operates, and to which the purchaser can practicably turn for supplies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).