Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pantron I Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an efficacy claim is “false” under the FTCA “if evidence developed under accepted standards of scientific research” so demonstrates
• finding that an act or practice is deceptive if there is a representation, omission, or practice that is likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably under the circumstances, and the representation, omission, or practice is material
• \discuss[ing] only the falsity theory” because \the F.T.C. clearly and expressly abandoned the reasonable basis theory”
• setting out the “falsity” and 15 “reasonable basis” theories of establishing that a representation is misleading
• directing district court to order appro­ priate monetary relief; noting that, if reimbursement of all consumers is imprac­ tical or impossible, district court may order another remedy that requires defendant to disgorge its unjust enrichment
• claim may be deemed deceptive if the advertiser had no reasonable basis to assert the claims as true or if the claim is demonstrably false

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).