Skip to main content
· 1/19/1925

Federal Sugar Refining Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 60 Ct. Cl. 184
  • 1925 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 569
  • 1925 WL 2663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ALJ was not required to consider a “disabled person placard statement” 11 because it was conclusory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Booth, Cambbell, Downey, Graham, Hat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.