Federal National Bank v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Younger abstention only applies where federal proceedings will “interfere with an ongoing state judicial proceeding”
• stating that Younger controls “whenever the requested relief would interfere with the state court’s ability to conduct proceedings, regardless of whether the relief targets the conduct of a proceeding directly.” (citations omitted)
• explaining that 7 Younger abstention is appropriate “whenever the requested relief would interfere with the state 8 court’s ability to conduct proceedings, regardless of whether the relief targets the conduct of a 9 proceeding directly.”
• allowing appellants to proceed with their claim under Ex parte Young, and then addressing Younger abstention and finding that abstention was warranted
• allowing appellants to proceed with their claim under Ex parte Young, and then addressing Younger abstention and finding that abstention was warranted
• allowing appellants to proceed with their claim under Ex parte Young, and then addressing Younger abstention and finding that abstention was warranted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).