Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning against \confus[ing] the identity of the requester with the interest asserted by the requester\
• cautioning against “confusing] the identity of the requester with the interest asserted by the requester”
• FLRA order must be upheld if it is a permissible construction of the Labor Act
• \Nowhere in the [Labor Statute] does its language indicate that the disclosure calculus required by FOIA should be modified. Nowhere do we find a qualification that the policies of collective bargaining should be integrated into FOIA\
• FLRA order must be upheld if it is a permissible construction of the Labor Act
• “FLRA’s reasonable interpretations of the Labor Statute are entitled to judicial deference. However, FLRA has no special expertise in interpreting the Privacy Act or FOIA. Therefore, questions of law arising from those statutes are reviewed de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).