Federal Insurance v. Starr Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the exception to the “no recovery” rule set forth in Neely did not apply “where the breach was the failure to pay [approximately 89.8%] of the contract consideration”
• refusing to consider “pay-when-paid” defense because it had not been raised in the trial court
• dispute between two insurance carriers concerning a subcontractor’s claim against a general contractor seeking payment for electrical work performed and materials supplied in a building renovation project

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).