Federal Insurance Co. v. Donovan Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the undisputed facts supported reformation based on mutual mistake
• “Although ordinarily a writing will be looked to as the only expression of the parties’ intent, in a reformation action in equity, parol evidence is admissible to demonstrate that the true intent was other than as expressed in the writing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).