Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Gulf Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that concern over compelling expert testimony diminished • where expert agrees to consult with adverse party
• finding that, absent a discovery abuse under Rule 26(b)(4)(B), expert testimony dispute is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 403
• consulting expert witness context; the expert at issue was not designated by the hiring party to testify
• excluding testimony of opposing party’s non-testifying expert because it “appealed] to be cumulative save, of course, for the fact that [the expert] was retained in the first instance by the [opposing side].”
• identifying the court’s interest as “an informed resolution of plaintiffs claim”
• characterizing prejudice from disclosure of prior retention to jury as “explosive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).