Skip to main content
· 9/22/2010

Federal Express Corp. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 765 F. Supp. 2d 1011
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142869
  • 2010 WL 6568293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing 2009 Morgan Stanley Research Parcel Returns Survey ranking Federal Express first under “Service Reliability”
  • discussing 2009 Morgan Stanley Research Parcel Returns Survey ranking Federal Express first under \Service Reliability\
  • plaintiff is “not required to set for evidence of actual consumer confusion at the pleading stage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tu M. Pham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.