· 9/22/2010
Federal Express Corp. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Citations
- 765 F. Supp. 2d 1011
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142869
- 2010 WL 6568293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing 2009 Morgan Stanley Research Parcel Returns Survey ranking Federal Express first under “Service Reliability”
- discussing 2009 Morgan Stanley Research Parcel Returns Survey ranking Federal Express first under \Service Reliability\
- plaintiff is “not required to set for evidence of actual consumer confusion at the pleading stage”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tu M. Pham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.