Skip to main content
· 4/28/1988

Federal Electric Corp. v. Carlucci

Citations

  • 687 F. Supp. 1
  • 34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,499
  • 1988 WL 47666
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a defendant challenges both subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction, the trial court was required to decide the issue the defendant had raised concerning subject matter jurisdiction
  • “The alleged failure of a complaint to state a cause of action for which relief can be granted . . . does not equate with a lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter of the complaint.”
  • finding non-resident defendant’s initiation of North Carolina contacts supported jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Penn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.