Federal Election Commission v. National Right to Work Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Citizens 19 United applies to independent campaign expenditures and has no relevance 20 to contribution limits
• holding that Citizens 19 United applies to independent campaign expenditures and has no relevance 20 to contribution limits
• noting that the FECA's provisions relating to corporate political spending were designed \to prevent both actual and apparent corruption\
• noting that the FECA’s provisions relating to corporate political spending were designed “to prevent both actual and apparent corruption”
• observing that legislative determination as to the need for prophylactic measures where corruption is evil feared will not be second-guessed
• stating that courts owe “considerable deference” to Congress's “careful legislative adjustment of the federal electoral laws, in a cautious advance, step by step”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).