Skip to main content
· 1/26/1995

Federal Deposit Insurance v. LeGrand

Citations

  • 43 F.3d 163
  • 31 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1498
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1494
  • 1995 WL 8992

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding when judgment creditor clearly indicated intent to proceed under procedure afforded by Federal Rules, state law was inapplicable
  • recognizing the following two-part test in determining whether tax returns should be produced: (1) the party seeking production of the documents must show their relevance to the inquiry; and (2
  • reviewing lower court’s contempt order for “abuse of discretion” under the “clearly erroneous standard.”
  • affirming court’s imposition of sanctions requiring defendant to pay movant attorneys’ fees
  • distinguishing Gomez and its progeny, in the course of upholding a magistrate's ability to enter a postjudgment discovery order, by highlighting \the critical nature of voir dire and its potentiality for affecting the outcome of a trial\
  • when judgment creditor clearly indicated intent to proceed under procedure afforded by Federal Rules, state law was inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Jolly, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.