Federal Deposit Insurance v. Gladstone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant could not assert the affirmative defense of latches because it was barred under state law
• stating that the court will only find a conflict between federal policy and the use of state law if it is clearly significant
• “the person wronged should not be spoken of as under a ‘duty’ to avoid damage, but rather a ‘disability’ to recover for avoidable loss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).