Skip to main content
· 3/8/1996

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Collins

Citations

  • 920 F. Supp. 30
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that courts should focus on the alleged wrongdoers’ actions, not the actions taken by the FDIC
  • disagreeing with the reasoning in Haines and holding that the affirmative defenses of failure to mitigate damages and contributory negligence were legally insufficient and ordering them stricken
  • “Where the defense is insufficient as a matter of law, the defense should be stricken to eliminate the day and unnecessary expense of litigating it at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.