Skip to main content
· 4/18/1990

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland

Citations

  • 742 F. Supp. 612
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7428
  • 1990 WL 103153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that section 1821(d)(14) should not be applied retroactively
  • rejecting the rationale of Holland & Knight and holding that “the ‘no duty rule’ remains viable as to third party professionals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castagna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.